beste cheat ever.

[AxelTB]

Lmao uid yes

 

[Strokes]

CAN SOMEONE FUCKING EXPLAIN THIS TO ME? SO LISTEN UP I TAP FATALITY,AW,SKEET,EVERY FUCKING CHEAT ON THE MARKET BUT I FUCKING GET TAPPED BY OTC A CHEAT FROM LAST YEAR,HOW IN THE WORLD IS THAT POSSIBLE!?!?!??!?!?!?!!!!!!!!!????????????

Buy me a sub, then all will be ok my childeren.

 

[rayangaming65]

first of all you meant == not =~ (for lua you use ~= if you want to check "not equal")
and disable is a function in a class most likely and the class object is resolver, therefore it should be resolver.disable(); i am pretty sure
for the love of god please stop adding a new line to "code" just for a bracket, looks much cleaner this way:

if (myString == "llama") {
    //code
}

also if in a parallel universe otv3 disables resolver based on what cheat the enemies are using then i think it would be done through a switch case (i think that works better than having dozens of if else statements)

yeah it's like aimware, if you don't use cheats and u turn on resolver on there it tries to resolve a non-existing desync. Onetap doesn't want to miss legits.
that's kinda why ot disables their resolver sometimes

 

[rayangaming65]

Every time I use a spoofer is easier to just make a new account. Lol talk about uids

why do you want to make new accounts?

 

[ReptilianArcher]

yos

 

[Mitsuha]

why do you want to make new accounts?

Because it's easier than waiting for a hwid reset by the staff. And because it's free

 

[Haunter]

=~

is a thing in ruby

 

[rayangaming65]

Because it's easier than waiting for a hwid reset by the staff. And because it's free

why do u want a hwid reset with no sub

 

[csalbert]

szar cheat

 

[Mitsuha]

why do u want a hwid reset with no sub

????
I'm talking about past accs with sub what are you on about

 

[rayangaming65]

????
I'm talking about past accs with sub what are you on about

o

 

[wann2k]

yeah it's like aimware, if you don't use cheats and u turn on resolver on there it tries to resolve a non-existing desync. Onetap doesn't want to miss legits.
that's kinda why ot disables their resolver sometimes

no the guy i replied to was referring that (as a joke) ot checks if the enemy is using otc somehow and then disables resolver for that person, i know ot is one of the only cheats that successfully disable resolver on legits (on some other cheats u either make a toggle or disable resolver in plist)
in all seriousness, v3 obviously does not disable resolver on otc users (you only mentioned legits and i am aware of v3's behavior when facing legits)

 

[wann2k]

is a thing in ruby

never looked at ruby code/syntax/tutorials etc. in any way shape or form so thanks for bonus knowledge

 

[shadeah]

first of all you meant == not =~ (for lua you use ~= if you want to check "not equal")
and disable is a function in a class most likely and the class object is resolver, therefore it should be resolver.disable(); i am pretty sure
for the love of god please stop adding a new line to "code" just for a bracket, looks much cleaner this way:

if (myString == "llama") {
    //code
}

also if in a parallel universe otv3 disables resolver based on what cheat the enemies are using then i think it would be done through a switch case (i think that works better than having dozens of if else statements)

i'm used to lua, sorry

 

[Peurr]

uid issue

7k hugl

 

[kifan]

u know
the higher your uid
the newer you are
the newer you are
the worse you'll be

and by you onetap is the onnly cheat out there? hhhhhhhh

 

[rayangaming65]

no the guy i replied to was referring that (as a joke) ot checks if the enemy is using otc somehow and then disables resolver for that person, i know ot is one of the only cheats that successfully disable resolver on legits (on some other cheats u either make a toggle or disable resolver in plist)
in all seriousness, v3 obviously does not disable resolver on otc users (you only mentioned legits and i am aware of v3's behavior when facing legits)

yeah i know you were joking

 

[rayangaming65]

and by you onetap is the onnly cheat out there? hhhhhhhh

the worse you'll be with onetap :/

 

[blurp]

first of all you meant == not =~ (for lua you use ~= if you want to check "not equal")
and disable is a function in a class most likely and the class object is resolver, therefore it should be resolver.disable(); i am pretty sure
for the love of god please stop adding a new line to "code" just for a bracket, looks much cleaner this way:

if (myString == "llama") {
    //code
}

also if in a parallel universe otv3 disables resolver based on what cheat the enemies are using then i think it would be done through a switch case (i think that works better than having dozens of if else statements)

wow men u so cul. tech me how to c0DZ Pl4zzzzz

 

[doxifieq]

first of all you meant == not =~ (for lua you use ~= if you want to check "not equal")
and disable is a function in a class most likely and the class object is resolver, therefore it should be resolver.disable(); i am pretty sure
for the love of god please stop adding a new line to "code" just for a bracket, looks much cleaner this way:

if (myString == "llama") {
    //code
}

also if in a parallel universe otv3 disables resolver based on what cheat the enemies are using then i think it would be done through a switch case (i think that works better than having dozens of if else statements)

shut the fuck up nerd